A Rigorous Assessment in Paris
PARIS — In June 2025, a delegation of officials from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) arrived in Paris. Led by Ambassador Evren Dağdelen Akgün, Rabbi Andrew Baker, and Professor Wolfgang Palaver, the Personal Representatives of the OSCE Chair-in-Office undertook a comprehensive mission to assess the state of freedom of religion or belief in France. Their resulting report, finalized in March 2026, offers a granular analysis of a nation navigating the complex intersection of its foundational republican values and its international human rights obligations.
Mandate and Methodology: Dialogue and Observation
The mandate of the OSCE in this domain is distinct. Unlike a judicial body, the organization functions as a security and cooperation forum, relying on dialogue and observation to uphold commitments made by participating States. The Personal Representatives on Tolerance and Non-Discrimination specifically focus on combating anti-Semitism, intolerance, and discrimination against Christians and members of other religions. Their methodology in France was rigorous, adhering to a protocol designed to capture the full spectrum of societal experience. The delegation first met separately with civil society representatives and religious communities—creating a space for unfiltered testimony—before engaging with government agencies and national advisory bodies.
This structure allowed the mission to dissect the practical application of laïcité (secularism), the constitutional principle that organizes public life in France. While the report acknowledges the French government’s assertion that laïcité is intended to ensure freedom of conscience rather than restrict it, the testimonies gathered reveal a more nuanced reality. The OSCE findings paint a picture of a state that is highly effective in certain areas of protection, yet faces significant challenges in the equitable treatment of minority beliefs.
Security, Antisemitism, and the Experience of Muslims
The report details the heavy burden borne by the Jewish community, the largest in Europe. In the face of sustained antisemitic incidents, including physical violence and harassment in educational settings, French authorities have maintained a heightened security posture. The delegation noted the visible protection of synagogues and schools, a measure that has undoubtedly prevented further bloodshed but has come at a high financial and psychological cost to the community itself. Furthermore, the legislative response to antisemitism in higher education, enacted shortly after the visit, was cited as a positive step toward addressing the climate of intimidation reported by Jewish students.
Similarly, regarding the Muslim community, the OSCE documented the state’s recognition of anti-Muslim hatred as a serious concern. The report notes the creation of platforms like ADDAM (Association of Defense against Discrimination and Anti-Muslim Acts) and the official acknowledgment of the murder of Aboubakar Cissé as a hate crime. However, the delegation also recorded persistent frustrations from Muslim civil society organizations regarding the “securitization” of their faith. Laws such as the 2021 “anti-separatism” legislation, while presented as counter-radicalization measures, are perceived by many Muslims as disproportionately targeting their ability to practice and organize, thereby fostering a deep mistrust of state institutions.
The Critical Lens on MIVILUDES
It is in the examination of religious and belief communities outside the three major monotheistic faiths that the OSCE report adopts its most critical tone toward the French administrative apparatus. The delegation focused considerable attention on the activities of MIVILUDES (The Interministerial Mission for Vigilance and Action Against Sectarian Aberrations). While the mission acknowledges that MIVILUDES states it does not monitor religious groups per se but rather addresses illegal behaviors, the report highlights significant concerns regarding its transparency and methodology.
Representatives of minority communities, including Jehovah’s Witnesses and Scientologists, expressed to the OSCE delegates that MIVILUDES employs a methodology that lacks clarity, particularly regarding the definition of “sectarian deviations.” The report notes a discrepancy in how similar behaviors are labeled: activities described as mere “aberrations” when associated with minority groups are often treated differently when occurring within mainstream denominations. A critical point raised in the findings is the absence of a right of reply for groups named in MIVILUDES reports, a procedure that stands in stark contrast to the principles of due process and natural justice enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
International Comparison and Judicial Consequences
This concern is not unique to the OSCE observers. A comparative analysis by the Swiss Centre Intercantonal d’Information sur les Croyances (CIC) highlights a fundamental divergence in approach between France and its neighbors. While the Swiss model emphasizes pragmatism, focusing on illegal acts committed within a religious context, the French model—particularly since the About-Picard law of 2001—incorporates the psychological concept of “mental control” or “emprise.” The CIC report argues that MIVILUDES’ analyses often rely on imprecise data and lack scientific
Leave a Reply