New Study Warns of Growing Use of Lawsuits to Silence Journalists and Activists Across Europe

In April, the European Union introduced an Anti-SLAPP Directive and issued guidelines aimed at tackling Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs). However, experts argue that these measures fall short.

One significant limitation, according to Urso, is the directive’s narrow scope, as it applies only to cross-border cases, ignoring domestic instances of SLAPPs. This leaves a gap in ensuring comprehensive protections.

Meanwhile, in the same month, the Council of Europe issued its own recommendation, providing a more robust framework to counter these kinds of lawsuits. Notably, it does include domestic cases and offers clear criteria for evaluating legal cases effectively.

“The Council of Europe’s recommendation is also more explicit when it comes to safeguarding those targeted by SLAPPs,” Urso explained. “It goes into considerable detail on compensating damages, while the EU directive focuses primarily on penalties.”

Urso emphasized the need for the EU to revisit its recommendations, advocating for stronger support mechanisms for SLAPP victims. “When you’re facing a SLAPP case, it’s crucial to have immediate access to resources, such as a lawyer who specializes in freedom of expression or human rights, as well as financial assistance to cover legal expenses,” she pointed out.

Additionally, Urso encouraged EU member states to actively implement the Council of Europe’s recommendations into their national laws. She also underscored the importance of engaging with civil society organizations that work on these issues to foster meaningful dialogue and collaboration.