Potential Roadblock for Assisted Dying Bill in the Lords
As it stands, there’s no certainty that the House of Lords will be able to amend the assisted dying bill without effectively derailing it. Any changes made in the Lords would need to return to the House of Commons for approval. However, given the limited time available for private members’ bills and the looming end of the parliamentary session, this could result in the bill being shelved altogether.
Daniel Gover, a senior lecturer in British politics at Queen Mary University of London, highlighted this issue, describing it as an “overlooked” aspect of the legislative process. He urged government ministers to make a “firm commitment” to allocate sufficient time for reviewing any amendments made by the Lords.
A Chamber of Expertise
The House of Lords is uniquely positioned to contribute to debates like this, owing to its wealth of expertise across fields such as law, medicine, religion, and human rights. While some of the staunchest critics of assisted dying are members of the Lords, the chamber cannot automatically be seen as more resistant to the proposal than the Commons.
In fact, a similar assisted dying bill introduced by crossbench peer Molly Meacher in 2021 passed its first reading without opposition but ultimately ran out of time.
One crossbench peer expressed hope that the Lords could refine the current bill using their collective experience. Unlike MPs in the Commons, many of whom are new to parliament and juggling legislative responsibilities with constituency work, members of the Lords may face less “extreme pressure” in considering the bill.
With a touch of humor, the same peer remarked: “We also have a special interest because quite a few of us are, shall we say, closer to the end of life than those in the Commons.”
Leave a Reply