Brussels (ANSA) – Europe is taking a cautious approach, distancing itself from London, as the transatlantic partnership shows signs of strain following the U.S. operation in Venezuela. While Washington acts decisively, European capitals advocate for adherence to international law and call for de-escalation, refraining from outright support for the U.S. stance.
European Parliament President Roberta Metsola asserted that “the Venezuelan people deserve freedom after enduring years of oppression,” emphasizing that the European Parliament does not recognize Nicolás Maduro as “the legitimately elected leader of Venezuela.” The UK’s position was notably clear, with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer stating that London “was in no way involved” in the U.S. operation and opting to withhold political judgment.
“I want first to establish the facts,” he remarked, indicating a cooling of relations with Washington that underscores European discomfort. In Brussels, the message is unified yet cautious. High Representative Kaja Kallas mentioned discussions with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the EU ambassador in Caracas, reiterating that the EU “is closely monitoring the situation” and has already stated that Maduro “lacks legitimacy.”
The crux of the EU’s position is reflected in the remarks of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who asserted that the Union stands “with the Venezuelan people” and supports a “peaceful and democratic transition.” “Any solution must respect international law and the United Nations Charter,” she emphasized.
European Council President Antonio Costa echoed similar sentiments, urging for “de-escalation and a peaceful, democratic, and inclusive resolution.” Spain’s stance aligns closely, calling for “de-escalation and responsibility” alongside adherence to “the principles of the United Nations Charter.”
In contrast, France has voiced a more distinct dissent: “No lasting political solution can be imposed externally,” stated French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot. He criticized the U.S. operation as a violation of “the principle of non-use of force, which is foundational to international law.” Italy also remarked that “external military action is not the solution to ending totalitarian regimes,” although it views “defensive interventions against hybrid threats to its own security, such as those related to state entities involved in drug trafficking, as legitimate” (January 3).
Leave a Reply