Each party acted in its own interest and was not expected to show loyalty to the customer, the ruling stated.
However, in one of the three cases, judges ruled that the consumer should be compensated as he was treated unfairly according to the Consumer Credit Act.
In this instance, the consumer, Marcus Gervase Johnson, had his claim upheld due to specific circumstances, including the large commission paid by the bank to the car dealer and the misleading nature of the documents provided during the vehicle sale, which created a false impression of terms offered by lenders.
“Mr. Johnson was commercially unsophisticated, and the court questions the extent to which a finance company could reasonably expect a customer to have read and understood the detail of such documents, particularly when no prominence was given to the relevant statements. For these reasons, the court holds that the relationship between Mr. Johnson and the finance company was unfair, and that the finance company should pay the amount of the commission to Mr. Johnson with interest at a commercial rate from the date of the agreement,” said Reed.
“Other customers’ claims are rejected.”
While some commission and compensation may still be payable to consumers after this one case was broadly successful, champagne is likely to be popping in the City of London, as some analysts estimate potential payouts for lenders could reach as high as £44 billion.
Leave a Reply