Just weeks before direct nuclear negotiations are set to begin between the U.S. and Iran in Muscat, Tehran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has executed a dramatic political reversal. After publicly condemning talks with Washington as “unwise, irrational, and dishonorable” in a televised address on March 2, 2025, he has now quietly consented to engage in face-to-face discussions.
This abrupt shift is more than mere diplomatic maneuvering — it signifies the regime’s deep fear of internal collapse. Amid economic turmoil, a worsening environmental crisis, and persistent public unrest, Tehran’s leadership faces mounting internal pressure. Confronted with a growing risk of uprising and strengthened international resolve, the regime has been forced into retreat.
Iran’s Global Record on Executions
According to Amnesty International, Iran was responsible for 64% of all documented executions worldwide in 2024. This staggering statistic illustrates a deliberate strategy of repression, especially in the wake of Tehran’s declining influence in Syria and Lebanon.
Khamenei once defended Iran’s military presence in Syria by stating, “If we don’t fight there, we’ll have to fight here, inside Iran.” With that regional buffer now weakened, the regime has doubled down on domestic suppression, accelerating executions to sow fear and crush dissent.
Repression Fueled by Manufactured Enemies
Like many authoritarian regimes, Iran’s clerical leadership has long depended on external threats to justify its domestic crackdowns. For more than four decades, it has wielded slogans like “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” as both propaganda tools and ideological cement. One regime insider candidly stated that “That slogan did more for us than ten intelligence agencies could have.”
Yet the primary targets of Tehran’s brutality remain internal: the Iranian populace and the democratic opposition that persistently calls for justice and reform.
The International Cost of Silence
Tehran’s crimes have spilled far beyond its borders. In 1988, a fatwa issued by Ayatollah Khomeini led to the execution of approximately 30,000 political prisoners — an act many experts categorize as a crime against humanity. The global response was largely muted. That inaction emboldened the regime, enabling further violence in Iraq, Syria, and Gaza.
Each time unrest threatens its hold on power, the regime stirs conflict abroad as a diversion — a predictable yet increasingly violent strategy.
Reform Is Not an Option
The Islamic Republic, rooted in a rigid theocratic structure and political absolutism, has shown itself incapable of true reform. Attempts at moderation have either been crushed outright or cynically used to buy time and legitimacy.
Real reform would necessitate freedom of speech, judicial transparency, and political plurality — values fundamentally incompatible with the current regime.
Direct Talks: A Fracture in the Regime’s Armor
Pursuing direct talks with the U.S. marks not just a policy pivot, but an ideological fracture. The regime has long defined itself by its opposition to the West. By choosing diplomacy with Washington to stave off collapse, it is undermining the very foundation of its legitimacy.
Hardliners within the Revolutionary Guards and intelligence services view these negotiations as betrayal. This internal dissent could spark broader upheaval in the months ahead.
Peace in the Region Starts with Accountability in Iran
While denuclearization is crucial, it is merely one piece of a larger puzzle. The Iranian people — who have suffered most under this regime and whose future has been jeopardized by its nuclear ambitions — deserve more than hollow diplomatic gestures. They need international solidarity.
In 2002, the National Council of Resistance of Iran revealed the regime’s covert nuclear facilities. Today, they continue to advocate for change from within. But the global community must act decisively.
Making future political and economic engagement contingent on an immediate halt to executions in Iran is one necessary step. It is not only a moral obligation, but also a strategic imperative to prevent further bloodshed and regional instability.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in this op-ed reflect solely those of the author and do not represent the official position of our publication. Eurotoday is committed to offering a platform for diverse perspectives, even those that may challenge our own. We remain dedicated to delivering high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
Eurotoday is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. We provide independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a continental lens, Eurotoday reports on EU policy, member state developments, and the broader international agenda from a European perspective.
Leave a Reply