
Strasbourg (Eurotoday) – The EU Parliament urged swift international action against Russia, enhanced sanctions, and increased military support for Ukraine.
In a resolution approved on 28 Nov 2024, the EU Parliament denounced Russia’s use of North Korean troops against the Ukrainian army and its testing of new ballistic missiles in Ukraine. MEPs stated recent escalatory measures represent a new stage in the war and a new risk for Europe’s security as a whole, calling on the EU and Ukraine’s other allies to respond accordingly.
How did MEPs call for broader international support for Ukraine?
MEPs insisted that “no negotiations about Ukraine can take place without Ukraine.” They urged the EU to work towards reaching the broadest possible international support for Ukraine and determining a peaceful solution to the war. The EU Parliament also called for the arrangement of the EU and the member states to enforce Ukraine’s Peace Formula and specify the necessary conditions for holding a second Summit on Peace, including committing countries from the Global South.
What further sanctions are needed against countries aiding Russia?
Regarding military support to Russia MEPs denounced Iran, Belarus and North Korea and urged the EU member states to further boost the sanctions regime against these nations. They emphasised that both Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and North Korea’s participation in the war and its nuclear and missile programmes form grave threats to the rules-based international order.
The resolution also called on Beijing to cease all military or dual-use help it is giving to Russia, adding that a denial to change course risks seriously concerning bilateral EU-China relations. Instead, China could use its considerable influence over North Korea and Russia to help reduce tensions, MEPs expressed.
What military aid does Ukraine need from the EU and NATO?
Moreover, MEPs asked the EU and its member states to boost their military support for Ukraine, including through the provision of aircraft, long-range missiles, including Taurus missiles, modern air defence systems, including Patriots and SAMP/T and ammunition, as well as MANPADS (Man-Portable Air-Defence Systems), guns and training programmes for the Ukrainian army. The resolution stated that all EU member states and NATO allies should devote themselves to helping Ukraine militarily, both collectively and individually, with no less than 0.25% of their GDP annually.
Comments
3 responses to “EU lawmakers call for increased global backing for Ukraine”
-
Looks like the EU is doubling down on the old “let’s support Ukraine” routine—because clearly throwing more money at a war is the new European pastime. 🤑 Maybe next time they can throw in a side of diplomacy with that military aid? 🍷
-
Isn’t it charming how the EU thinks a stern letter will do the trick? I suppose they’ll follow it up with a nice pastry to sweeten the deal. 🍰
-
Oh, brilliant! Just what we needed—more meetings and resolutions! Seems like our MEPs are convinced that a bit of extra military hardware will turn the tide while they sit around sipping espresso. ☕💼
Last News
Europe’s budget war starts now
Next, they introduce the four new govern
MEPs Largely Support New EU-US Trade Agreement
MEPs have backed the EU-US trade deal, saying it is a “pragmatic and necessary agreement that gives European businesses the certainty they need in uncertain times.”
Meeting in Strasbourg, member of the European Parliament voted in favour of the two regulations implementing the EU-US Turnberry tariff arrangement.
The main proposal, adopted by 440 votes to 151 with 50 abstentions, eliminates tarif
England Face Croatia’s Old Lesson
A World Cup opener in Dallas unites English hopes and Croatian tournament legacy
England kicks off their 2026 FIFA World Cup against Croatia in Dallas on Wednesday, a clash influenced by factors beyond the group stage. For Thomas Tuchel’s team, it’s a chance to see if their talented squad can translate potential into success. For Croatia, it’s an opportunity to demonstrate that tournament
How Macron Persuaded Trump at the G7, Until the Next Disagreement
The second phase of U.S.-Iran talks, if the initial deal is signed Friday, will focus on Iran’s nuclear program and include France, Germany, and the U.K., who orig
US-Iran Peace Deal Welcomed by EU
The EU has warmly welcomed the agreement reached between the US and Iran.
This, it goes on to say, follows “sustained diplomatic effort” by several partners.
The priority now, cautions the EU, is its “swift and full implementation by all parties.”
The war began with US and Israeli strikes across Iran on 28 February, prompting Iran to attack Israel and US-allied states in the Gulf
Commission pres
EU Endorses Tougher Regulations for Migrant Returns
Parliament supports expedited procedures, extended detention, and return hubs as key safeguards in the migration debate
The European Parliament has sanctioned a new EU-wide system for returning third-country nationals lacking legal residency rights, providing political momentum to one of the most debated aspects of Europe’s migration overhaul. The reform aims to speed up and make return decision
West Cooperates on AI to Exclude China
During the discussions, China freque
Kemi Badenoch "can make an impact with innovative thinking" on the UK-Europe relationship
It is difficult to see how the Europe question will not resurface once Labour has decided to politely thank Sir Keir Starmer for his work in making Labour re-electable after the lost Corbyn years but look for a new leader and prime minister who is a professional politician not a government legal manager who decided to go into politics as a retirement hobby.
In his latest batch of opinion polls
Europe’s bathing waters remain safe to swim | Press releases
European Lawmakers Call on Albania to Stop Kushner-Linked Project Construction
This aligns with the Commission’s warnings that Albania’s EU accession risks stalling without an environmental impact assessment.
The European Parliament and Commission demand Albania reverse its protected areas law chang



Leave a Reply