Strasbourg (Eurotoday) – The European Parliament and EPPO sign an agreement allowing corruption investigations, enhancing anti-fraud efforts and transparency.
As reported by Politico, European Parliament President Roberta Metsola inked a working arrangement with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) authorising investigations within the institution.
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) is an autonomous public prosecution office of the European Union. It is mandated for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment offences against the financial interests of the EU. These include several sorts of fraud, VAT fraud with impairments above 10 million euros, money laundering, corruption, etc.
How will the EPPO investigate corruption within the parliament?
The agreement between the parliament and the prosecutor’s office is the first agreement of its kind between the two institutions. Most especially, it will make it more manageable for EPPO to access the EU Parliament and probe corruption cases within the institution. “It will make our fight against crime and fraud faster and better. Ultimately this agreement is about protecting EU taxpayers’ money,” stated.
How does the agreement improve access to parliamentary records?
The arrangement makes it easier for EPPO to access the Parliament’s premises, to request to renounce the immunity of lawmakers and team and to access documents linked to investigations. The agreement comes weeks after EPPO informed it is conducting an investigation into one of the Parliament’s political parties, the European People’s Party (EPP). For investigations linked to members of the European Parliament, EPPO will have to reach Metsola. For investigations into Parliament staff, it will reach the secretary-general.
According to the contract, the EPPO will need to report to the Parliament any searches at least 48 hours in advance. In addition, the EPPO will need to inform the Parliament regarding ongoing investigations, and in turn, the Parliament must notify the EPPO of financial criminal conduct among its staff.
What does the new EPPO-Parliament agreement aim to achieve?
In his remarks, blank” rel=”noopener”>Victor Negrescu, the Parliament vice-president for the fight against corruption and transparency policies, claimed that the agreement, which reflects a similar deal between EPPO and the European Commission in 2021, aims to “improve our anticorruption mechanisms” and to “provide legal certainty to EPPO investigations.” “It is a huge step forward for our institution and a clear message of support for EPPO by the European Parliament,” he stated.
Comments
3 responses to “EPPO Granted Authority to Investigate Corruption in EU Parliament”
-
Oh, fantastic! Finally, the EPPO gets a backstage pass to the EU Parliament—like letting the fox guard the henhouse, innit? 😏 Who knew fighting corruption could be as bureaucratic as a snail race on a Sunday? 🐌💼
-
Oh, brilliant move! Nothing screams “We’re serious about transparency!” quite like a fancy agreement to check each other’s pockets. 🤔💼 Let’s just hope the EPPO doesn’t trip over all the red tape while searching for loose change! 😅
-
Oh fantastic, the EPPO can now investigate the Parliament—because who doesn’t love a good bureaucratic tango while the rest of us are just trying to get our taxes sorted? 🤷♂️ Hope they’ve packed their lunch; it might take a while to find anything in that maze! 🍽️
Last News
EU Investigates Meta’s Addictive Design
According to reports from Bloomberg and highlighted by European technology media, the Commission has yet to formally a
Der Hitlergruß des AfD-Landeschefs
Support for EU Membership Stays Strong Among Candidate Nations
That is the message to emerge after the European Commission published the results of the latest perception surveys on enlargement among citizens in the Western Balkans, Eastern Neighbourhood and Türkiye.
The findings, revealed on Friday, show that support for EU accession remains strong across the enlargement partners.
It says citizens are continuing to associate closer ties with the European Un
Pension Reform Supported by EU Ministers
EU finance ministers have endorsed revisions to two significant financial frameworks, bringing Brussels closer to updating regulations on pan-European personal pensions and sustainability-focused investment products. The Council’s positions decided on Wednesday establish the member states’
What Does Burnham’s Appointment of Former Blair Minister Signify?
European Union Leaders Pledge to Safeguard Artistic Freedom
The Presidents of the European Parliament, Council and Commission have pledged to “protect, promote and support” culture in Europe.
On the sidelines of the European Council which ended on Friday in Brussels, they signed a joint declaration entitled “Europe for Culture, Culture for Europe”.
The declaration sets out their shared political commitment to protecting, promoting and supporting culture
Causes of Democratic Backsliding
Jenrick: "Burnham is Keir Starmer in a dodgy polo shirt"
He continued: “If you don’t meet our economic tests, then you’re going to have to leave the country. And if you’re in social housing, it’s very, very likely that you won’t me
Brexit Has Impacted Britain, Making the UK More European Than Ever Before
10 years ago Nigel Farage was in political heaven. Since entering the European Parliament in 1999 at the head of a small anti-European Party he had only one demand. That Britain organise a referendum on leaving the European Union. It was held on 23 June 2016.
His wish was granted by the coalition government headed by the Conservative Prime Minister, David Cameron and his deputy the Europhile lea
EU Strengthens Child Abuse Legislation
Provisional deal targets AI-generated abuse material, sextortion and delayed access to justice for survivors
The European Union has provisionally agreed to enhance criminal law against child sexual abuse and exploitation, addressing new digital threats and extending the timeframe for survivors to seek justice. This agreement, pending approval from the European Parliament and the Council, is a ke
Leave a Reply