Khan’s lawyers claim there’s a deliberate “Palantir strategy,” where the company takes on low-cost public contracts, often as pilots, to skirt effective, transparent competition and procurement laws, then influences the authority to award more contracts without fair competition or lawful procurement.
The statement alleges the Met Police intentionally bypassed getting approval for its procurement strategy from MOPAC and consistently misled MOPAC to suggest multiple firms, including Palantir, were being considered.
These issues prevented officials from advising Khan’s deputy that the contract was financially sound, as stated in the document.
A Palantir spokesperson labeled the defense statement as “false,” stating it disregards pilot results and outsourcing guidance.
The Met refrained from commenting on the legal case, acknowledging it isn’t a named party but has responded to the case.
The trial is anticipated for January 2027.
MOPAC will collaborate with the Met Police to establish a competitive tender for desired AI and data capabilities, allowing Palantir to bid.
Meanwhile, the Met Police has prolonged the pilot, using Palantir’s software to identify internal misconduct.













Leave a Reply